Belgium Considers Night-Time Online Gambling Ban and Tighter Limits in 2026

Belgium may be heading toward a new phase of gambling regulation as fresh proposals reopen the debate on player protection and responsible gaming. In early January 2026, Rob Beenders, Federal Minister for Consumer Protection, publicly raised the possibility of night-time shutdowns for online gambling platforms, alongside stricter limits on player spending and tougher rules on commercial practices.

If adopted, these measures could significantly reshape the Belgian online gambling market as early as 2026.

According to Minister Beenders, one of the biggest structural risks in modern gambling is constant availability. With online casinos and betting platforms accessible around the clock, players—especially those already vulnerable—are more likely to lose control during periods where social oversight is minimal.

His remarks were partly triggered by a widely reported case in Flanders involving a player who accumulated massive losses by opening multiple accounts under different identities—highlighting persistent weaknesses in the current system.

The most eye-catching proposal involves blocking access to online gambling platforms during overnight hours. Rather than a symbolic restriction, the plan would rely on technical enforcement, making it impossible for players to log in between midnight and 6 a.m.

The measure would apply to licensed Belgian online casinos, sports betting platforms and all forms of remote gambling, potentially placing Belgium among Europe’s strictest jurisdictions.

Belgium already enforces a weekly deposit limit of €200 per operator, but this system is widely considered easy to bypass. One idea now being discussed is the introduction of a single global spending cap, for example €250 per week, applied across all licensed gambling sites combined.

This limit could be enforced through central identification systems such as itsme, preventing players from exceeding legal thresholds by spreading deposits across multiple platforms—a concern long raised by the Belgian Gaming Commission (CJH).

Beyond access and spending limits, attention is also turning to how operators attract and retain players. Recurring bonuses, promotional incentives and VIP programs are increasingly viewed as mechanisms that can encourage risky gambling behaviour.

Further restrictions—or even bans—on these practices are being considered, continuing Belgium’s gradual tightening of gambling-related marketing rules.

Despite the strong public statements, gambling regulation does not fall directly under Beenders’ authority. That responsibility lies with David Clarinval, meaning any legislative change would need to come from the Ministry of the Economy and secure government approval.

Political divisions—particularly around the balance between consumer protection and the legal gambling market—may complicate progress.

Belgium already operates a robust gambling control system, including mandatory player identification, deposit limits, self-exclusion mechanisms and active regulatory oversight. However, ongoing reports of addiction and regulatory loopholes suggest that further structural changes may be required to address modern online gambling dynamics.

Whether these proposals become law remains uncertain, but they clearly signal a shift in the tone of the national debate. Night-time shutdowns, centralised spending limits and tougher commercial rules would represent a fundamental change for both players and operators.

The coming months will determine whether Belgium moves toward one of Europe’s most restrictive online gambling frameworks—or whether political resistance slows reform efforts.